From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: PARISC list <parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>,
John David Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>,
Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] pthread attributes and stack positions (gcc related?)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:10:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030929151038.GC15180@systemhalted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1064771620.10778.5.camel@mulgrave>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 12:53:38PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 12:42, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > The variable is definately on the process stack. The thread's stack
> > address seems to be inside the libraries 'writable' space and the stack
> > size is wrong (or uninitialized). Perhaps I should just be looking for
> > arch-dependant init code that we might be missing.
>
> This, I believe to be correct: there's only one real stack (i.e. the
> thing on x86 that grows down from top of memory) and only one thread can
> have it. The rest of the thread stacks are mmapped at fixed sizes with
> a guard area to prevent them growing too far. mmapped memory comes out
> of the same pool that shared library memory comes from, so you should
> correctly see the mappings interleave (depending on the load and thread
> start order).
I agree, it seems though that after "fork" the values returned by
"pthread_getattr_np (pthread_self (), &a);" are bogus. While if you call
pthread_create(...) and then the previous line from within the newly
created thread the values are initialized properly. A mistake might
exist with symbol versioning by which we are not calling libpthread's
overloaded thread manager "fork()" and continuing on with the normal syscall.
I think this seems to be a question of expected behaviour. I'll pass
this onto the libc-alpha list.
c.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-29 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-28 17:42 [parisc-linux] pthread attributes and stack positions (gcc related?) Carlos O'Donell
2003-09-28 17:53 ` James Bottomley
2003-09-29 15:10 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2003-09-29 19:02 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030929151038.GC15180@systemhalted \
--to=carlos@baldric.uwo.ca \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=tausq@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox