Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: HPPA FPU Specification? (FE_INEXACT raised by accident)
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:31:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031020173124.GD32666@systemhalted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310201631.h9KGVZ49001423@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>

> > Does having them both at the same time violates the behaviour of
> > "feraiseexcept" in the ISO C standard (especially in the case of
> > underflow)? If feraiseexcept is called and only an underflow 
> > requested, but underflow and inexact are enabled, what then?
> 
> Does this help?  The standard says
> 
> "Whether the feraiseexcept function additionally raises the inexact
> exception whenever it raises the overflow or underflow exceptions is
> implementation defined."

Ah! I must admit I missed that bit. It does help. It means that I can
officially mark our 'fenv' as compliant and wash my hands clean of any
worry :)

c.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-20 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-19 21:51 [parisc-linux] HPPA FPU Specification? (FE_INEXACT raised by accident) Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-19 23:16 ` [parisc-linux] " John David Anglin
2003-10-20  5:02   ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-20 15:30     ` John David Anglin
2003-10-20 16:01       ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-20 16:31         ` John David Anglin
2003-10-20 16:56           ` John David Anglin
2003-10-20 17:34             ` [parisc-linux] fenv laid to rest, 50% done porting dbl-64 to ldbl-64, no testing yet Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-20 17:49               ` John David Anglin
2003-10-20 19:04                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-21 10:42                 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-21 17:31                   ` John David Anglin
2003-10-20 17:31           ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031020173124.GD32666@systemhalted \
    --to=carlos@baldric.uwo.ca \
    --cc=dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca \
    --cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox