From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from colo.lackof.org (colo.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1054854 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:11:27 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:11:26 -0600 From: Grant Grundler To: Joel Soete Message-ID: <20040426171126.GE23029@colo.lackof.org> References: <408D3DDB00000005@ocpmta1.freegates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <408D3DDB00000005@ocpmta1.freegates.net> Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: kernel>=2.6.4-rc3 hung or panic on C1[18]0 List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:52:40PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote: > and here cmd is a "Scsi_Cmnd *" which is so of different type because of > "typedef struct scsi_cmnd Scsi_Cmnd" uhm...the typedef says Scsi_Cmnd *IS* struct scsi_cmnd. Therefor "Scsi_Cmnd *" is the same type as "struct scsi_cmnd *". > What should it be done? Get rid of Scsi_Cmnd typedef? I personally consider it bad style to use both forms in the same subsystem and don't really care which is used. But that's an issue for the subsystem maintainer to decide. :^) grant