From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] A couple of minor patches for 2.6.7-pa1 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 19:11:11 -0600 Message-ID: <20040619011111.GA23535@colo.lackof.org> References: <40D30E3C.1010809@tiscali.be> <40D34A27.8060009@tiscali.be> <35844.127.0.0.1.1087594933.squirrel@www.puszczka.com> <20040618212600.GB12572@engsoc.org> <35884.127.0.0.1.1087595933.squirrel@www.puszczka.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: Andy Walker Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <35884.127.0.0.1.1087595933.squirrel@www.puszczka.com> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:58:53PM +0200, Andy Walker wrote: > Errm, no thank you - unless there are very good reasons why I need a > new GCC. If you want 7300LC scheduling support? There's a whole raft of bug fixes betweem gcc 3.0.4 and gcc 3.3.3. But I can understand the reluctance to upgrade. > The automated builds on http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.6 These are developement kernels. Treat them like "unstable". > are broken for the B180 config because of this change which sends out > the message that current versions are broken on 7300LC. Bad message! > And I don't think we should be forcing GCC upgrades on people like this. This is not forcing anyone to upgrade unless they want to use *exactly* that config file. It's not reasonable to build "unstable" kernel debs from "stable" tool chain. thanks, grant _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux