From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [RFC] Reorder compat structure placement and casting (firmware.c)? Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 22:33:33 -0600 Message-ID: <20040806043333.GG20367@colo.lackof.org> References: <20040801045032.GE31520@baldric.uwo.ca> <20040802052751.GD20904@colo.lackof.org> <20040805040600.GA21912@baldric.uwo.ca> <20040805205937.GB20367@colo.lackof.org> <20040806035128.GE2672@baldric.uwo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: Carlos O'Donell Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20040806035128.GE2672@baldric.uwo.ca> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 11:51:28PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > I don't exclude making narrow calls from a wide kernel. ok > How about something like this? It's actually cleaner to add more > assembly labels. Yes - that's basically what I initially had hacked up but didn't test since I saw you had an alternative posted already. The only possible problem with multiple labels is gcc won't know the two labels are aliases. See my previous posting on this thread. But I don't know if it's really a problem at all or just an overly active imagination. grant _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux