From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: [parisc-linux] interesting linker behaviour :)
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:22:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040921172245.GS22642@tausq.org> (raw)
willy found a problem this morning with the exception code which was
traced down to the following:
the following code comes from lusercopy.S (with macros expanded):
lstrncpy_from_user:
.proc
.callinfo NO_CALLS
.entry
comib,= 0,%r24,$lsfu_done
copy %r24,%r23
get_sr
1: ldbs,ma 1(%sr1,%r25),%r1
$lsfu_loop:
stbs,ma %r1,1(%r26)
comib,=,n 0,%r1,$lsfu_done
addib,<>,n -1,%r24,$lsfu_loop
2: ldbs,ma 1(%sr1,%r25),%r1
$lsfu_done:
sub %r23,%r24,%r28
$lsfu_exit:
bv %r0(%r2)
nop
.exit
.section .fixup,"ax"
3: b $lsfu_exit
ldi -EFAULT,%r28
.previous
.section __ex_table,"aw"
.word 1b,3b
.word 2b,3b
.previous
.procend
what is supposed to happen is that when a fault happens at "1:", we
would branch to "3:". The code in "3:" sets the return value to -EFAULT
and branches back to the exit path.
what we observed was that when a fault happens, we get an endless loop
of faults.
when i disassembled the code at 3:, i see:
1038ce68: e8 05 00 7d b,l 10357eac <tcpdiag_dump+0x5ac>,r0
1038ce6c: 34 1c 3f e5 ldi -e,ret0
the target of the branch is a long branch stub:
10357eac: 20 20 02 02 ldil 10100000,r1
10357eb0: e0 20 22 b2 be,n 158(sr4,r1)
but 10100158 is lstrncpy_from_user, not $lsfu_exit:
10100158 <lstrncpy_from_user>
10100190 <$lsfu_exit>
i wonder if the sections are somehow confusing things.... this is with
fairly recent gcc/binutils toolchains, for 32-bit.
randolph
--
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-21 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-21 17:22 Randolph Chung [this message]
2004-09-21 17:43 ` [parisc-linux] interesting linker behaviour :) Carlos O'Donell
2004-09-21 17:46 ` Carlos O'Donell
2004-09-21 18:51 ` John David Anglin
2004-09-21 19:49 ` Randolph Chung
2004-09-21 20:06 ` John David Anglin
2004-09-21 20:20 ` John David Anglin
2004-09-21 20:36 ` Randolph Chung
2004-09-21 22:04 ` Carlos O'Donell
2004-09-21 22:19 ` Carlos O'Donell
2004-09-21 22:21 ` John David Anglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040921172245.GS22642@tausq.org \
--to=randolph@tausq.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox