From: "Michael S. Zick" <mszick@wolfbutter.com>
To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] DIFF use 6-regs in copy_user_page_asm
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:51:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501040851.19806.mszick@wolfbutter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050104061342.GE18497@tausq.org>
On Tue January 4 2005 00:13, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > This patch adds one more cycle between the load and store of a
> > given register by using three pairs of registers instead of two.
> > I had previously quoted one of the PA-8xxx papers that indicated
> > L1 cache was 2 cycles latency.
> > With this diff, the unrolled part of the loop now meets that.
> > The prolog and epilogue obviously cannot.
> >
> > If anyone can show me a workload that improves with this diff,
> > I'll apply it. Otherwise it's just an academic excercise.
>
> i'd like to see numbers too, but i doubt you will see any. it appears
> that at least newer PA cpus do a sufficient amount of internal
> instruction reordering that you don't see a difference as long as there
> are enough pending instructions to keep the pipeline busy.
>
One other possibility to keep in mind when testing: this is an
io sequence, no heavy register-register computations.
If the 4-regs + internal reordering has already saturated the
cpu-external busses...
Then even if the cpu-core can execute the 6-regs + internal
reordering more effectively, you will never see it outside
of the cpu.
You might have to borrow a buss analyzer from the hardware
lab to see if this is effecting your tests.
Mike
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-03 6:19 [parisc-linux] DIFF use 6-regs in copy_user_page_asm Grant Grundler
2005-01-04 6:13 ` Randolph Chung
2005-01-04 8:23 ` Ryan Bradetich
2005-01-04 8:29 ` Randolph Chung
2005-01-04 13:12 ` Joel Soete
2005-01-04 14:51 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2005-01-04 16:02 ` Grant Grundler
[not found] ` <200501041142.44400.mszick@wolfbutter.com>
2005-01-04 20:09 ` Grant Grundler
2005-01-04 23:39 ` Grant Grundler
2005-01-05 0:00 ` John David Anglin
2005-01-05 22:01 ` Michael S. Zick
2005-01-06 22:55 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501040851.19806.mszick@wolfbutter.com \
--to=mszick@wolfbutter.com \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox