From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Zick" Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: prezeroing patch test against 2.6.11-rc2-pa0 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:36:25 -0600 Message-ID: <200501230836.26024.mszick@wolfbutter.com> References: <41DE941B00001965@mail-6-bnl.tiscali.it> <41F2E78B.5070908@tiscali.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <41F2E78B.5070908@tiscali.be> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Sat January 22 2005 17:53, Joel Soete wrote: > Just an update to mentioned that the last Christoph's patch against our 2.6.11-rc2-pa0 (with some small ack) boot fine on my c110: > # ps -ef | grep scr > root 10 1 0 00:38 ? 00:00:04 [kscrubd0] > :-) > Joel, That sounds good. I haven't been watching for newer patches. I have been working on my patch de-mangler. It has been slow going because I have never used Lua before. I have had it on my to-do list of things to learn for several years. I started out just to correct indentation whitespace... Now it also reformats bad hunk headers and re-writes incorrect hunk headers. Both with informative messages to the user. None of that: "Malformed patch" and exit. Which is what the patch program does. I have a couple more small changes to make, but it is working pretty well now. Given a 643,000+ line patchfile (21 Mbyte) it takes about 10 seconds to re-write it. With a reasonable sized patchfile, you can't even notice it's run time. So it has been fun, even if we don't need it for Christoph's old patchfiles. Mike _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux