From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: [parisc-linux] ssm/rsm sequences Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:20:55 -0600 Message-ID: <20050427052055.GJ2612@colo.lackof.org> References: <20050425165540.GD12325@colo.lackof.org> <200504251744.j3PHixu9015886@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <20050427022925.GH2612@colo.lackof.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: rhirst@levanta.com Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20050427022925.GH2612@colo.lackof.org> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 08:29:25PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > The example code is just that, an example: > SSM 0,gr0 ; initial RSM, SSM, or MTSM > ... > > AFAICT, that sequence does nothing but burn some cycles. *sigh*. The ssm 0,0/nop * 8/rsm sequence isn't so obvious. Richard Hirst added this comment to entry.S in 2001: * The ssm is necessary due to a PCXT bug http://lists.parisc-linux.org/hypermail/parisc-linux-cvs/3628.html Richard, any clue what the bug is? I don't have a PCX-T ERS or errata sheet to look this up. thanks, grant _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux