From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: [patch] spinlock consolidation, v2 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:31:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20050606163141.GA15703@elte.hu> References: <20050603173132.GX14929@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050606060512.GB30857@colo.lackof.org> <20050606073627.GA10387@elte.hu> <20050606151232.GA24437@colo.lackof.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, Matthew Wilcox To: Grant Grundler Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20050606151232.GA24437@colo.lackof.org> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org * Grant Grundler wrote: > > I feel a bit uneasy about using the raw > > spinlocks directly - they were not intended to be used like that, for > > the time being. Right now they are internal types. > > They are arch specific types (asm/spinlock_types.h) and I'm only using > raw_spinlock_t in arch specific code. please dont use the raw spinlocks. They dont carry some features such as debugging. (or any other future feature of the generic spinlock_t type) Ingo _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux