From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] J2240 - Almost there.... Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:18:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20060104181854.GE20079@colo.lackof.org> References: <7d01f9f00601010615v54117490o9a575fd279244524@mail.gmail.com> <000401c61003$cea58c60$3401a8c0@POGO> <20060104174332.GB20079@colo.lackof.org> <20060104174943.GP19769@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: Matthew Wilcox Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20060104174943.GP19769@parisc-linux.org> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:49:43AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: ... > > 0000:00:03.0 is tulip in slot 3. > > 0000:01:14.0 is tulip built-in. (my guess) > > I disagree. The 'Cujo' on GSC bus 8 is actually a Dino. As I said > in my earlier mail, I've now fixed this. I couldn't tell if the names were wrong offhand - needed ioscan output (got it) and compare. Thanks for fixing this. > So I think eth0 (00:03.0) is actually the built-in one. I think I got this right despite PCI controller names. Workstations typically hardwired the PCI slot to use the same device number (e.g. 3) as what is silk screened on the back of the machine. Built-in devices were typically given numbers much greater than the highest slot number. Servers never did this just because that scheme doesn't work multi-cell systems with > 32 PCI slots (e.g. superdome) or multiple IO bays with identical silk screened slot numbers. thanks, grant _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux