From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] alternate insn for parisc (ccio/sba) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:07:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20060306170729.GB21702@colo.lackof.org> References: <20060303201428.GA25283@quicksilver.road.mcmartin.ca> <20060304003802.GB18473@colo.lackof.org> <440907C5.7050503@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, Kyle McMartin To: Randolph Chung Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <440907C5.7050503@tausq.org> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:21:41AM +0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > Just my 2 cents, but unless it is code that is performance critical and > we can demonstrate a significant difference on a particular measurement, > and it is not something that can be determined at compile time, I think > we should do runtime code patching sparingly. If nothing else, it makes > the code harder to read and perhaps to debug. Agreed. I was just stretching a bit to find an example. cheers, grant _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux