From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Does it lakes some cloberred r1 in Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:25:45 -0600 Message-ID: <20060424162545.GA25893@colo.lackof.org> References: <200604231206.53217.mszick@morethan.org> <200604241535.k3OFZmPJ027261@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: John David Anglin Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <200604241535.k3OFZmPJ027261@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:35:48AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > The intent of the errata seems to be to relax the alignment requirement > for ldc[dw],co in cases where the spinlock is not being shared with a > non-coherent I/O device. AFAIK, only one non-coherent PA-RISC box has PA2.0 and parisc-linux doesn't support it: T600. (I'm assuming ",co" completer is PA2.0 only - please correct me if that's wrong.) grant _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux