From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Bailey Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] NPTL: The Bad News. Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:54:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20060907155428.GA5447@titanium.v3.ca> References: <119aab440609061723r168cc628x3bf2dfb18bac1641@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: parisc-linux To: "Carlos O'Donell" Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <119aab440609061723r168cc628x3bf2dfb18bac1641@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 08:23:18PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > The bad news is that I didn't work much on my thesis this long weekend. > The good news is that I fixed many serious flaws related to: > > 1. Stack direction, stack guards, and stack permissions. > 2. Low level locking primitives returning the wrong values. > 3. EAGAIN != EWOULDBLOCK snafu's > 4. Compiler bugs. > 5. Makefile bugs. > > My current set of libc + tls + nptl failures is now down to: Nice! I don't see these in CVS yet. Is there a branch or something you're working on? > make[2]: [libc-tls-nptl/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) Why is this under the "not cool" set? This is there for every arch. > make[2]: *** [libc-tls-nptl/elf/tst-audit2.out] Error 139 Aside from the segfault, is the audit interface even written? Tks, Jeff Bailey -- I do not agree with a word you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. - Voltaire _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux