From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: dma_addr_t: which comment is correct? Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:51:59 -0700 Message-ID: <20071224085159.GC15161@colo.lackof.org> References: <476CFFE3.3040102@scarlet.be> <20071223093903.GA30259@colo.lackof.org> <476EE63A.9080807@scarlet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org To: rubisher Return-path: In-Reply-To: <476EE63A.9080807@scarlet.be> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 10:50:34PM +0000, rubisher wrote: ... > btw do you notice how much way are there (in so few lines) to use a > unsigned 32bits integer: u32, __u32 but also uint32_t, u_int32_t, ... > > Is there some advise om the best pratice? IIRC, Preferred is "u32". But use whatever is consistent with the file you are editing. > > Ah also related to ccio-dma patch test on my c110, it seems that removing > DELAYED_RESOURCE_CNT code help a bit this system with few ram (64Mb only) > to survive a bit longer (enough to debootstrap and download 800Mb to be > installed) but that didn't make the drill: there are still fs corruption > from time to time and some reset on the lasi disk ;-(. > This test just seems to confirm an issue of i/o coherency somewhere but > where those rules could be broken??? ISTR Joel Soete reporting problems for CCIO machines as well. Offhand, I don't know what's wrong and we depend on Ryan Bradetich and other volunteers to track that down. cheers, grant > > Merry Xmas, > r. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html