From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in
 blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20080719.002826.73806419.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20080717131444K.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0807170746001.31185@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
	<20080717221908D.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
To: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080717221908D.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
List-ID: <linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org

From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:18:44 +0900

> BTW, as I've already said, I'm not against removing the vmerge
> accounting from the block layer.

I am also, as stated, not against this.

Fujita-san, please proposage a patch so that we can put this
issue behind us :-)