From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix RTC_CLASS regression with PARISC Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080908.195235.200905674.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200809081629.21125.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080908.164427.216880550.davem@davemloft.net> <200809081755.26148.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, alessandro.zummo@towertech.it To: david-b@pacbell.net Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200809081755.26148.david-b@pacbell.net> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org From: David Brownell Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:55:25 -0700 > On Monday 08 September 2008, David Miller wrote: > > From: David Brownell > > Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:29:20 -0700 > > > > > That said, there's a bit of unresolved stuff around NTP hooks > > > in the kernel. Some patches are pending to let thtem work with > > > the RTC framework -- where writing an RTC may need to sleep, > > > for example because the RTC is on an I2C or SPI bus. And > > > then there's the discussion of whether that shouldn't all be > > > handled by NTPD anyway, no special kernel support desired. > > > Alessandro has opinions there. ;) > > > > My update_persistent_clock() on sparc64 is: > > > > int update_persistent_clock(struct timespec now) > > { > > struct rtc_device *rtc = rtc_class_open("rtc0"); > > I'd be tempted to cache that ... notice how you never > close it, too. That will goof lots of refcounts... Well if I cache it then we'll hold it forever and that's not so nice right? I'm going to put the missing rtc_close() in there for now to fix the leak. I'm happy to cache this if you think it's warranted, but then this is like saying that the refcount doesn't matter :-) > =============== CUT ON THE DOTTED LINE ================== > Subject: ntp: let update_persistent_clock() sleep > From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" I see, as Paul mentioned this is needed for stuff like RTCs behind I2C. This change isn't in Linus's tree yet.