From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jaswinder@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Confusion in usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:24:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901210124.26118.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090120.161626.93641145.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:34:17 +0530
>
> > usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h is giving 2 'make headers_check' warnings:
> > usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:127: leaks CONFIG_64BIT to userspace where it is not valid
> > usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:149: leaks CONFIG_64BIT to userspace where it is not valid
> >
> > usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:
> ...
> > #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT will always be true for userspace. So what is the use of #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT ?
>
> Good catch.
>
> This file needs to test for 64-bit'ness using some non-CONFIG_*
> test. And the standard built-in CPP macros which can be used
> to check for that are different on every platform.
I think we should simply define a macro for use in the kernel, e.g. in
<asm/types.h>. There already is a BITS_PER_LONG macro in there, maybe
we can add an exported __BITS_PER_LONG there that checks for the right
macro on each architecture.
On parisc, there is a major confusion in this area, at some point, all
checks for __LP64__ got replaced with CONFIG_64BIT there. While I have
not understood what the problem with __LP64__ was, the check for
CONFIG_64BIT on parisc user space looks very wrong.
Arnd <><
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-21 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1232496257.3123.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20090120.161626.93641145.davem@davemloft.net>
2009-01-21 0:24 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-01-21 0:32 ` Confusion in usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h David Miller
2009-01-21 8:13 ` Helge Deller
2009-01-21 8:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-21 11:38 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-21 12:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-01-21 14:29 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-21 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-21 17:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-21 17:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-27 22:35 ` Helge Deller
2009-01-21 22:25 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-21 22:43 ` John David Anglin
2009-01-22 0:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-22 2:52 ` John David Anglin
2009-01-22 2:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901210124.26118.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).