From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dann frazier Subject: Re: HPPA and Squeeze Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:39:39 -0600 Message-ID: <20090614183939.GA22340@lackof.org> References: <20090602140734.GC26721@mx0.halon.org.uk> <20090606183600.GA425@lackof.org> <4A31FA76.20103@debian.org> <9905faa50906120053u3f58af9fubac865a921ff4eaa@mail.gmail.com> <9905faa50906120055n2626c787q7c112b9ca1bf1311@mail.gmail.com> <1244816185.4184.3.camel@mulgrave.site> <20090612153544.GA27867@lackof.org> <7d01f9f00906141129h35e90347r90fb5e415654544d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: James Bottomley , Bart Schelstraete , HPPA porters , Debian Release , admin@debian-ports.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org To: Thibaut VARENE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7d01f9f00906141129h35e90347r90fb5e415654544d@mail.gmail.com> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 08:29:14PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:35 PM, dann frazier wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:16:25AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > >> It seems to be related to what machine you actually have. > > > > And the load - buildds for unstable seem to trip over issues that we > > don't see elsewhere. > > "Workload" more to the point. Yes, workload is what I meant. > Almost all my parisc boxen have been > running BOINC for years and never puked on it. I'm quite convinced the > issues buildds are suffering are much less random than people believe. > It's more likely that they are very uncommon corner cases. > > FWIW, afaik "lafayette" - the autobuilder I recently provided - seems > to be running mostly fine. And as far as I (as the local admin) am > concerned, I believe my "response" time to problems (such as when the > first hardware that was committed to this autobuilder failed beyond > salvation and had to be entirely replaced) is acceptable. Let me know > if that weren't true ;-) > > HTH > T-Bone > -- dann frazier