From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
Cc: Debian HPPA Port List <debian-hppa@lists.debian.org>,
"linux-parisc" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: Transition hppa from linuxthreads to nptl is ready to proceed.
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:57:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909081357.37995.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <119aab440909071454s7923b95atce6f5f5a7e5b469d@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1046 bytes --]
On Monday 07 September 2009 17:54:01 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> The following patches implement version 2 of the NPTL upgrade for
> hppa. This second version is a rewrite of internal pthread structures
> and is 100% ABI backwards compatible. All old applications will run
> with the new glibc, including during partial upgrades.
>
> I have tested the following patches with eglibc_2.10.1-0exp1, the
> testing has included the standard glibc regression testing, simulation
> of partial upgrades, and heavy chroot testing with Xnest, and several
> large multithreaded UI applications (evince, xchat, nautilus,
> gnome-session etc). All tests succeeded.
>
> * Please add the following patch to the hppa set of patches:
> http://www.parisc-linux.org/~carlos/debian-final_glibc-ports-hppa-nptl.diff
any reason for not pushing this (and all the other hppa patches) to the glibc
ports tree ? it isnt like you'll be breaking anything that isnt already
broken, and it'll make it easier for people to play with mainline glibc.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-07 21:54 Transition hppa from linuxthreads to nptl is ready to proceed Carlos O'Donell
[not found] ` <200909080034.30234.elendil@planet.nl>
2009-09-08 10:59 ` Domenico Andreoli
2009-09-08 17:57 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2009-09-08 18:04 ` Carlos O'Donell
2009-09-08 18:35 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909081357.37995.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
--cc=debian-hppa@lists.debian.org \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox