From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: Removing HPPA Linuxthreads support in glibc-ports. Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:31:50 -0400 Message-ID: <201110201631.52046.vapier@gentoo.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1607603.J82LT7Zjv1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Cc: "linux-parisc" , Debian HPPA Port List , Gentoo HPPA To: "Carlos O'Donell" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org --nextPart1607603.J82LT7Zjv1 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 20 October 2011 14:55:46 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > I plan to remove all HPPA Linuxthreads support from glibc-ports. >=20 > The support is well past bit-rotten. >=20 > Is anyone opposed to this? guess we don't have much choice since it's been purged from the core. but= =20 nptl support isn't mainlined yet right ? :/ =2Dmike --nextPart1607603.J82LT7Zjv1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOoIU3AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBLZAP/3VyF+++DFyUu2dU7PVCFxKP ibDUf409YUFh5AEegKHkF34EKdqyBKF2YRPWK4AvCECXSJoFqLmVLh0DvnVbZCZT WF8REPz8Fa3AkjtF2PUsjHRGCxgc3wdm9koqjj9N6cyeJ2av8C3cTMDNhQWYEZTq 3xbKynMI4m4RYj9ZRceI5Id/T4SQ/naQloBLrbfbsqtlEEgShxRnA8ymKC4BXrHC KoF3ULXyWCqXMd0lCPah0etu7My4EqqpQ7laLC33klmT7Jm/RPiKhTlsM8b7qoxl aYXQjKqJY9V3xU8fpkWeWMImmlGLtnzoV7xgtiyDYLRqNDyTtN4E6XvBcDiWjTa7 gAQSOLAL9yBhEZSDkWs/n6FWugsMOnZFg7edA+jeOKSx6M2HCFbB/8gfnklcW8Jb oNC+WqLhWSQtNXcGJNTIDnG+bFzpoIuHGarXZXqd9nxDu/QmW7hrGASrpThd5F0J XLr364RrzH150k4aCqtdcD6MWfZHOxxHnsAJf9JnVu3J+2OBeU7fBXyshd4LrDaB 3cTcs2vP7AGbwhhEiZhr/diuuZlIB0duc2W5ZHpO34uAFEXbIypJnjaFp8YQ99mQ c4yxtFk3feI5KIKO9TAYcYgIeKYP2qBGoK2Gjy6+swmwdnzEXigkMdTtXWZc6RIx xxRc9pHYVjByhoeDQAin =WqPk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1607603.J82LT7Zjv1--