public inbox for linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: what's parisc execve_wrapper doing in the end?
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:21:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121005192133.GA2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349448936.3638.64.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>

On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:55:36PM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:

> But there's not a lot of point.  forking an idle thread actually doesn't
> care about any of the register execution setup because it never really
> uses it to execute.  That's why it was safe for us to use the user
> thread setup ... I suppose the interior of the kernel thread case could
> be conditioned on if (usp).

FWIW, I'm digging through the fork_idle() interplay with copy_thread()
right now and the more I'm looking the less I like having called
copy_thread() at all on that path.  Note that copy_process() can trivially
tell it from the normal (do_fork()) caller, just by checking if pid
is non-NULL.  And it has to check that anyway when it decides to generate
the pid for child...

Hell knows; I wonder how much of copy_thread() work is needed in that case...

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-05 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20121004045150.GH23473@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-04  9:30 ` what's parisc execve_wrapper doing in the end? James Bottomley
2012-10-05 11:07   ` James Bottomley
2012-10-05 13:44     ` James Bottomley
2012-10-05 14:47       ` James Bottomley
2012-10-05 14:48       ` Al Viro
2012-10-05 14:55         ` James Bottomley
2012-10-05 19:21           ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-10-05 23:04           ` Al Viro
2012-10-08 11:28             ` James Bottomley
2012-10-09  9:55               ` James Bottomley
2012-10-10  4:26                 ` Al Viro
2012-10-05 22:54         ` John David Anglin
2012-10-05 23:32           ` Al Viro
2012-10-06  0:15             ` John David Anglin
     [not found] ` <20121004051359.GA24664@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-04 10:02   ` James Bottomley
2012-10-04 12:22     ` Al Viro
2012-10-04 12:57       ` James Bottomley
2012-10-04 13:30         ` Carlos O'Donell
2012-10-04 14:07           ` Al Viro
2012-10-05  0:00             ` John David Anglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121005192133.GA2616@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox