From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: add pF/pf deprecation warning Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 01:33:24 +0900 Message-ID: <20170920163324.GB502@tigerII.localdomain> References: <20170920162910.32053-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170920162910.32053-9-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , James Bottomley , Helge Deller , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Jessica Yu , Alexei Starovoitov , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches To: Sergey Senozhatsky Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170920162910.32053-9-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org On (09/21/17 01:29), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > We deprecated '%pF/%pf' printk specifiers, since '%pS/%ps' is now smart > enough to handle function pointer dereference on platforms where such > dereference is required. > > checkpatch warning example: > > WARNING: Use '%pS/%ps' instead. This pointer extension was deprecated: '%pF' weird... somehow I sent this patch twice. please ignore this one. -ss