From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563F3C04AAF for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 14:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACCD2087B for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 14:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=brauner.io header.i=@brauner.io header.b="MhjOHc+1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727673AbfEPOFN (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 10:05:13 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:41000 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727629AbfEPOFM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 10:05:12 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id m4so5436766edd.8 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:05:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brauner.io; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bYyJnADr9ubhW5oaXdh9WlhTHjyzAGu0DQI2eQ+pHaE=; b=MhjOHc+12NO1kjqTg26hcfpFarWJK6UO4uKen3mnBZiVvgNz65ljzXS/ZRyK+jjEzc /JF15wWLnH7LRgIqtY0MD+nIanFGFyFhIksGgTJWi2bGoTMD18BMjjca67gxxRvxi8+0 yQTTRxRIh7g2VDxBQ0zKZz1vXg1chuW2SN2qbepgb4FeuGMxhGooqxVI7+7FHAOj9N1M FHodeukkhZGpge8teMzG2zc9TJCjzMji+6KCaGF81DZdV6StlcqORhINQ4uQjbmc8vco TjK91z8PkXrFbRk1vdkCD5WKK6krFwmTdVA0wTPdFmhQ9BFoHPYiofHEVgNBJZi0CYJz Lvrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=bYyJnADr9ubhW5oaXdh9WlhTHjyzAGu0DQI2eQ+pHaE=; b=tTSg7ojYmSa85JD8h9Kn3UHkuNgstxlH2mD+nzWyCcqVB4lWY0Z22GypiU/mp+1bvO IQVa+zmYdXOw9Fca0dyNG6nrzdy/ogEKI+iMd4Rlgtqsvk0PaowW488QFppP59BD5dZY gFVlYTCxosFAV8oRQbQxXxQ+H1i9Jb/BF1X+33ykUs+OW8B091LyecpF663KmEy45YCD xOiQNu6JYu9XrazeQvOUKAk67+Cpemorg3W9uXsf97h5EwO/PhGr+CdpYqwpe1yrhLnt P5aNR4dHJfKDmaYT/dlAb8/BDqqwfTRST+WzBlnYtFB7oX5WrkJzg+wl2u8rVQ/G7eFk mf/w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX3NL72QlZGkColXnHN2Wqr+vlQETSLxE4nODydieqEdch6Q3Hd Od41PssOng6SLitP/o4Y7kKtbw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy/zkegU6awCybVYKMai3zZjnS7ZHStCqrWAP9elvrkEbm/ZCiD/6p0jcTly9aqPNEwI1KvNw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:65d2:: with SMTP id z18mr20105763ejn.68.1558015510995; Thu, 16 May 2019 07:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brauner.io ([193.96.224.243]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b53sm1120044edd.89.2019.05.16.07.05.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 May 2019 07:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 16:05:08 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Jann Horn Cc: Daniel Colascione , Oleg Nesterov , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , Arnd Bergmann , David Howells , Andrew Morton , Aleksa Sarai , "Eric W. Biederman" , Elena Reshetova , Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390 , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Linux API , linux-arch , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pid: add pidfd_open() Message-ID: <20190516140507.75crjbaulasw6mj6@brauner.io> References: <20190515100400.3450-1-christian@brauner.io> <20190516130813.i66ujfzftbgpqhnh@brauner.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:08 PM Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:45:06AM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 3:04 AM Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > > > > > This adds the pidfd_open() syscall. It allows a caller to retrieve pollable > > > > pidfds for a process which did not get created via CLONE_PIDFD, i.e. for a > > > > process that is created via traditional fork()/clone() calls that is only > > > > referenced by a PID: > [...] > > > > +/** > > > > + * pidfd_open() - Open new pid file descriptor. > > > > + * > > > > + * @pid: pid for which to retrieve a pidfd > > > > + * @flags: flags to pass > > > > + * > > > > + * This creates a new pid file descriptor with the O_CLOEXEC flag set for > > > > + * the process identified by @pid. Currently, the process identified by > > > > + * @pid must be a thread-group leader. This restriction currently exists > > > > + * for all aspects of pidfds including pidfd creation (CLONE_PIDFD cannot > > > > + * be used with CLONE_THREAD) and pidfd polling (only supports thread group > > > > + * leaders). > > > > + * > > > > + * Return: On success, a cloexec pidfd is returned. > > > > + * On error, a negative errno number will be returned. > > > > + */ > > > > +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pidfd_open, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, flags) > > > > +{ > [...] > > > > + if (pid <= 0) > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > > > WDYT of defining pid == 0 to mean "open myself"? > > > > I'm torn. It be a nice shortcut of course but pid being 0 is usually an > > indicator for child processes. So unless the getpid() before > > pidfd_open() is an issue I'd say let's leave it as is. If you really > > want the shortcut might -1 be better? > > Joining the bikeshed painting club: Please don't allow either 0 or -1 > as shortcut for "self". James Forshaw found an Android security bug a > while back (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=727) > that passed a PID to getpidcon(), except that the PID was 0 > (placeholder for oneway binder transactions), and then the service > thought it was talking to itself. You could pick some other number and > provide a #define for that, but I think pidfd_open(getpid(), ...) > makes more sense. Yes, I agree. I left it as is for v1, i.e. no shortcut; getpid() should do. Christian