From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=4k5Q=TY=vger.kernel.org=linux-parisc-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916D8C072B5
	for <linux-parisc@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 24 May 2019 06:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2387B21841
	for <linux-parisc@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 24 May 2019 06:39:19 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=duncanthrax.net header.i=@duncanthrax.net header.b="NvmficCX"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2388887AbfEXGjS (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-parisc@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 24 May 2019 02:39:18 -0400
Received: from smtp.duncanthrax.net ([89.31.1.170]:36812 "EHLO
        smtp.duncanthrax.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S2388580AbfEXGjS (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 24 May 2019 02:39:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=duncanthrax.net; s=dkim; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References
        :Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
        bh=t7FxIPGRaX15FYe2B+VUKDr5S28k9TFwjC3Q6tVuykI=; b=NvmficCXIn3J/9a1TKexfynORT
        7Mq7esEQlmqmeiSK5TS3b42fYNpYqjaGPaiij0JGrGOtjuDuEsgX3KcwP8lW7t7f4/n/7SSh2JN82
        iFcYAVXahkw+DE435RBwTjzHDtfCtEGfnDdTR+fWuU/6QM8E2eQ55uLKUqwB0tV9X7b4=;
Received: from frobwit.duncanthrax.net ([89.31.1.178] helo=t470p.stackframe.org)
        by smtp.eurescom.eu with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
        (Exim 4.86_2)
        (envelope-from <svens@stackframe.org>)
        id 1hU3rI-0002m7-43; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:39:16 +0200
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 08:39:09 +0200
From:   Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>
To:     Grant Grundler <grantgrundler@gmail.com>
Cc:     Carlo Pisani <carlojpisani@gmail.com>,
        John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>,
        linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HPPA problems with the PCI
Message-ID: <20190524063909.GA9661@t470p.stackframe.org>
References: <CA+QBN9Cg6QAe5W3vS3dere=K53NAHDrMb9FN5StEfNkC=RTGqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+QBN9B7B39NARTNYan2wrhRLSEAhxukTy0B6yWRMUxgLJmuNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP6odjiqDyVB3VyavSHniShe3Mq3KWGdNOWeTmxQ-5q-NrOjbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <21dcf273-929a-6fb1-7978-37145ea62301@bell.net>
 <CAP6odjh2-HhbPYhFqc40cVCrVc6E689CM65WqbiTOnTRgeQojQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <483d54a6-cbf4-e366-60b3-ae84d025d0e6@bell.net>
 <CA+QBN9A3Cajm8vYSQ9rm-iZyGjtMBSfmDXqGgrUc5F3pOziEVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+QBN9Dg16azb3kLZ4pPi+G5h46C628dWZRdXJmrmxOZZvLn9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP6odjiBTYLAMDYxtWKOK1vbftXkf_6_r-_ttwjuswvrMyCdAQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAP6odjiBTYLAMDYxtWKOK1vbftXkf_6_r-_ttwjuswvrMyCdAQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org

Hi Grant,

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 04:09:34PM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> 
> AFAIK, parisc never used firmware to route IRQ lines. For starters,
> the CPUs never had an IRQ input and always used messages (equivalent
> to MMIO writes) directed at a CPUs EIEM register.

I think you mean EIRR here?

Regards
Sven