From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3585C072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 07:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714F1206A3 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 07:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=duncanthrax.net header.i=@duncanthrax.net header.b="clKy06zb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388891AbfEXHGo (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 03:06:44 -0400 Received: from smtp.duncanthrax.net ([89.31.1.170]:34030 "EHLO smtp.duncanthrax.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388869AbfEXHGn (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 03:06:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=duncanthrax.net; s=dkim; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References :Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=9/lHKo7D+ODLju5llatY+9LBZizGJPsZ1cA2uZTPwSk=; b=clKy06zbyPi5xr4uJxwl/BdBkC rQkk8okHb/2jDYriBFnMHqhme44Y5ALEh5tgccjiMkHVzTzB5YpiI2IXpzJ/xRpVOo8nXh9C/GaMo wDsThMeboTlOfKrPjKQDsYiPzxU5sbxHKnZbrbyxViy+qozuC+EeJRGOLi8PjiyXr4yA=; Received: from frobwit.duncanthrax.net ([89.31.1.178] helo=t470p.stackframe.org) by smtp.eurescom.eu with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hU4Hq-0003OM-2D; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:06:42 +0200 Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 09:06:40 +0200 From: Sven Schnelle To: Carlo Pisani Cc: John David Anglin , Grant Grundler , linux-parisc Subject: Re: HPPA problems with the PCI Message-ID: <20190524070640.GB9849@t470p.stackframe.org> References: <21dcf273-929a-6fb1-7978-37145ea62301@bell.net> <483d54a6-cbf4-e366-60b3-ae84d025d0e6@bell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Hi Carlo, On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 02:16:39PM +0200, Carlo Pisani wrote: > > Carlo, are you testing with UP or SMP kernel? > > Kernel without SMP. > I am recompiling with SMP just right now I think you've seen that problem also with older Kernel versions, but i have some trouble with my C240 (see my other post), so it might be worth a try to take the latest kernel and disabling alternatives patching (add no-alternatives to the kernel command line) To check that alternative patching is disabled, check that there's no message like this in your dmesg output: [ 33.419615] alternatives: applied 158 out of 183 patches Thanks for testing Linux on PA-RISC :-) Regards Sven