From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA3BC07542 for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 20:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6783B206BA for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 20:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=duncanthrax.net header.i=@duncanthrax.net header.b="hlaSdO9l" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727286AbfEYU4k (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 May 2019 16:56:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.duncanthrax.net ([89.31.1.170]:32842 "EHLO smtp.duncanthrax.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725995AbfEYU4k (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 May 2019 16:56:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=duncanthrax.net; s=dkim; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References :Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=R6+AHZajOmwhYlF14AyaYGeXbAAbtRfV94ykIUg2fMs=; b=hlaSdO9lAKqPly0011L8sGc3tK e+F15BJVgv4qIJO7WHtdHbgBKqxL2ldAToFF1CeScm+J4JCV9DFL1WgsMyD47U1zmJK5qVcH/JyOl NCq1chypHUxDekCS868yZpbirEW0RZF9dlRyKgSKqldChXOJrV/ewAHyXnlLsoUHdbuI=; Received: from [134.3.44.134] (helo=t470p.stackframe.org) by smtp.eurescom.eu with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hUdiX-0002Ld-LB; Sat, 25 May 2019 22:56:37 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 22:56:36 +0200 From: Sven Schnelle To: Carlo Pisani Cc: Grant Grundler , John David Anglin , linux-parisc Subject: Re: HPPA problems with the PCI Message-ID: <20190525205636.GA1969@t470p.stackframe.org> References: <21dcf273-929a-6fb1-7978-37145ea62301@bell.net> <483d54a6-cbf4-e366-60b3-ae84d025d0e6@bell.net> <20190524063909.GA9661@t470p.stackframe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 11:01:27AM +0200, Carlo Pisani wrote: > on kernel 5.1, from the git repository, compiled with SMP > > dmesg | grep altern > [ 2.551002] alternatives: applied 156 out of 175 patches > > this patch has made my day! > It seems the solution for the problem! > > the card is still working after 10 hours of burn-in test! > > --- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/cache.h > +++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/cache.h > @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ void parisc_setup_cache_timing(void); > > #define asm_io_fdc(addr) asm volatile("fdc %%r0(%0)" \ > ALTERNATIVE(ALT_COND_NO_DCACHE, INSN_NOP) \ > - ALTERNATIVE(ALT_COND_NO_IOC_FDC, INSN_NOP) \ > : : "r" (addr) : "memory") > #define asm_io_sync() asm volatile("sync" \ > ALTERNATIVE(ALT_COND_NO_DCACHE, INSN_NOP) \ Just for clarification: This change was never meant to be a real fix - it was just a change i made to figure out which alternative patch breaks things on my C240. Sven