From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A604ECE588 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336B42064A for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="UhqyUbUZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728710AbfJOQy0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:54:26 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:56338 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726362AbfJOQy0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:54:26 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F157800C5C9C957E5FD72EA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f15:7800:c5c9:c957:e5fd:72ea]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 48D971EC0C9F; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:54:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1571158463; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=rnMDMAxve5tu5ORyg7bCimEqvhkoKSIi/WDG5Ckj2mw=; b=UhqyUbUZxF1aKEZWmjOecjXQ40If2V00t93Kg4amOFs1vb1YblTprErgXmjYAMMbFs1i2U rBG4AYHzxbTMLCTcsNJJf17cTI1+Sh6IITzgESuitrr3eMc1W3eIWHwig8gGPLDTSj8piu pPldqgdkCAB3vxJ1gR+l+JfeKn/aG08= Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:54:13 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Kees Cook , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , x86@kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Dave Hansen , Heiko Carstens , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Yoshinori Sato , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rick Edgecombe , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] powerpc: Rename "notes" PT_NOTE to "note" Message-ID: <20191015165412.GD596@zn.tnic> References: <20191011000609.29728-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20191011000609.29728-2-keescook@chromium.org> <20191011082519.GI9749@gate.crashing.org> <201910110910.48270FC97@keescook> <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191011162552.GK9749@gate.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:25:52AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Names *matter*, internal names doubly so. So why replace a good name with > a worse name? Because it is slightly less work for you? So if we agree on the name "notes" and we decide to rename the other arches, this should all be done in a separate patchset anyway, and ontop of this one. And I believe Kees wouldn't mind doing it ontop since he's gotten his hands dirty already. :-P Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette