Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
To: matoro <matoro_mailinglist_kernel@matoro.tk>,
	Linux Parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	deller@kernel.org, Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	linmag7@gmail.com, Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bisected] ext4 corruption on parisc since 6.12
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 20:47:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31c884b9-77c8-48dc-b84c-20e52cdc4d44@bell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84d7b3e1053b2a8397bcc7fc8eee8106@matoro.tk>

I haven't seen any file system corruption on rp3440 with several weeks of running with clock events.  I just
started running 6.12.1 today though.

I have the following timer config:

# Timers subsystem
#
CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON=y
# CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC is not set
CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE=y
# CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
# end of Timers subsystem

There was some concern about this change on systems where the CPU timers aren't synchronized.  what
systems do you see this on?

Dave

On 2024-12-01 7:26 p.m., matoro wrote:
> Hi Helge, when booting 6.12 here myself and another user (CC'd) both observed our ext4 filesystems to be immediately corrupted in the same 
> manner.
>
> Every file that is read or written will have its access/modify times set to 2446-05-10 18:38:55.0000, which is the maximum ext4 timestamp.  
> The 32-bit userspace doesn't seem to be able to handle this at all, as every further stat() call will error with "Value too large for defined 
> data type".  Unfortunately, simply rolling back to kernel 6.11 is insufficient to recover, as the filesystem corruption is persistent, and the 
> errors come from userspace attempting to read the modified files.  I was able to recover with a command like:  find / -newermt 2446-01-01 -o 
> -newerct 2446-01-01 -o -newerat 2446-01-01 | xargs touch -h
>
> Luckily, lindholm was able to bisect and identified as the culprit commit:  b5ff52be891347f8847872c49d7a5c2fa29400a7 ("parisc: Convert to 
> generic clockevents").  Some other comments from the discussion:
>
> 17:20:37 <awilfox> would be curious if keeping that patch + CONFIG_SMP=n fixes it
> 17:20:44 <awilfox> this doesn't look necessarily correct on MP machines
> 17:23:56 <awilfox> time_keeper_id is now unused; the old code specifically marked the clocksource as unstable on MP machines despite having 
> per_cpu before
> 17:24:11 <awilfox> and now it seems to imply CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERCPU is enough to work around it
> 17:24:13 <awilfox> maybe it isn't
>
> Thanks!


-- 
John David Anglin  dave.anglin@bell.net


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-02  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-02  0:26 [bisected] ext4 corruption on parisc since 6.12 matoro
2024-12-02  1:47 ` John David Anglin [this message]
2024-12-02  4:55   ` matoro
2024-12-02  6:30     ` Magnus Lindholm
2024-12-02 14:54       ` John David Anglin
2024-12-02 15:31         ` matoro
2024-12-02 16:35           ` Helge Deller
2024-12-02 19:45           ` John David Anglin
2024-12-03 16:38             ` John David Anglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31c884b9-77c8-48dc-b84c-20e52cdc4d44@bell.net \
    --to=dave.anglin@bell.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=deller@kernel.org \
    --cc=linmag7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matoro_mailinglist_kernel@matoro.tk \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox