From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolm3.tiscalinet.be [212.35.2.72]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA8D482A for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 06:03:48 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:03:43 +0100 Message-ID: <3E35C33F00000B40@ocpmta3.freegates.net> In-Reply-To: <3E35C33F00000975@ocpmta3.freegates.net> From: "Joel Soete" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Issues with seteuid()? To: "Randolph Chung" Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: PA, >... >>> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited >>> max user processes (-u) 20 >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited >> >>That's the reason..... if you do 'ulimit -u unlimited' (or at least a >>bigger number) you should be ok. >> >ulimit -u unlimited > >(just for fun I can download to 64 for this test case; is there any means >to determine a reasonnable value (unstable seems to set it to 999)?) > > >PS: Where is defined this default? > It seems to be my bad ;_(). It appears in my own apt-get update Log that I use the default (ie N) when the update procedure of 'libpam-modules' dpkg proposed me to change '/etc/security/limits.conf. Sorry and thanks again for your support, Joel ********************************************* Vous surfez toujours avec une ligne classique ? Faites des economies avec Tiscali Complete... Plus d'info sur ... http://complete.tiscali.be