From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpout1.tiscali.be (unknown [62.235.13.193]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F04482C for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 03:53:01 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:52:54 +0200 Message-ID: <3EC761C200001DBB@ocpmta7.freegates.net> In-Reply-To: <20030519163245.GN16608@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> From: "Joel Soete" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] glibc pthreads actual threads? To: "Matthew Wilcox" Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: >On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 06:27:41PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote: >> But notice a very strange behaviour: >> _the pid is not the same for each thread_ ?? >> >> Having just a small sunos 5.8 with gcc-3.2.2 (but with native libpthread) >> the pb does not occurs? >> >> Is it a limit of glibc (in general or in 2.3 only?) for all linux or only >> hppa? > >it's a limit of your understanding ;-) POSIX specifies both behaviours >are legitimate. > Just for remind and for those who also have this kind of philophical pb :-)). In fact following test, an ardent discuss born here between high level system engineer and one of them help me to find this interesting link: Joel --------------------------------- Vous surfez avec une ligne classique ? Economisez jusqu'à 25% avec Tiscali Complete ! Offre spéciale : première année d'abonnement offerte. ... Plus d'info sur http://complete.tiscali.be