Re: [parisc-linux] Re: g++ (3.3): ...Error: Field out of range

["Joel Soete" <jsoe0708@tiscali.be>]

Hey Dave,

> Putting me on the CC list of the PR would be appreciated.

May be have you already recieved this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11254


[...]
> These are the options that provide detailed control for inlining:
>
>   --param max-inline-insns-rtl=<value> The maximum number of instructions
for
> the RTL inliner
>   --param min-inline-insns=<value>     The number of instructions in a
single
> functions still eligible to inlining after a lot recursive inlining
>   --param max-inline-slope=<value>     The slope of the linear function

> throttling inlining after the recursive inlining limit has been reached
is 
> given by the negative reciprocal value of this parameter
>   --param max-inline-insns=<value>     The maximum number of instructions
by
>  repeated inlining before gcc starts to throttle inlining
>   --param max-inline-insns-auto=<value> The maximum number of instructions
>  when automatically inlining
>   --param max-inline-insns-single=<value> The maximum number of instructions
>  in a single function eligible for inlining

> The RTL is not used by C or C++ anymore.  Look in the GCC file params.def
> for the defaults and discussion.  I think reducing PARAM_MAX_INLINE_INSNS
> from its default of 600 to something in the range of 200-300, or less will
> help.  You might also make the slope more aggressive.  I know that changes
> are needed to build LyX (see <http://gcc/gnu.org/PR?10160>).

Ah, in fact I well read it also but do not figure out because of man comment:
"max-inline-insns
    If an function contains more than this many instructions, it
    will not be inlined.  This option is precisely equivalent to
    -finline-limit.
"

Anyway, I try 300, 200, 100 and stop at 50 without any more success :-(
(I can still try lower?)

Thanks again for all,
    Joel


---------------------------------
Tiscali ADSL: 19,50 euros/mois...abonnez-vous sur www.tiscali.be