From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo2.tiscali.be [62.235.13.211]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CCB4829 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:44:18 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3EE1007C.3030904@tiscali.be> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 20:58:36 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Grabert" Cc: Joel Soete , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: compiler & kernel (2) Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: M. Grabert wrote: >On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Joel Soete wrote: > > > >>Hi Max, >> >> >> >>>Attachment: config-2.4.20-pa35-gcc-3.3 >>> >>> >>> >>32-bits first; >>I test this config with gcc-3.3-2 and binutils 2.13.90.0.18-7 but I encounter >>following pb: >> >>`gcc-3.3 -print-libgcc-file-name` /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-pa35/arch/parisc/lib/lib.a >> >>/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-pa35/lib/lib.a \ >> --end-group \ >> -o vmlinux >>drivers/net/wireless/wireless_net.o(.init.text+0x78): In function `init_orinoco_cs': >> >> >> >Yes, I enabled PCMCIA specific bits in arch/parisc/config.in. I wanted >to get a PCMCIA wireless network card working. >Currently hppa doesn't give you the option to select PCMCIA, so you have >to modify the config.in so that you can select it. Just copy the PCMCIA >bits it from arch/i386/config.in to arch/parisc/config.in. > >OR simpler: > >Disable wireless network (orinoco, hermes, orinoco_cs etc.). > > Well finaly I reach to continue only some test. I so choose this simpler solution to build 32 kernel with gcc-3.0 first and it compiles well (it took about 15min excluded modules). I launch it on my b2k and it seems to works fine (any boot pb); I so use it to rebuild te same kernel with gcc-3.3. It also compiles well (in about 12min). But I notice something strange: runing a top in another xterm, I notice that swap was well on but absolutly not used where usually my kernel (near about debian std cfg) used about 20Mb of swap (with 256Mb of ram). Is it a wanted behaviour? (config option?) Thanks, Joel PS: I do not yet reboot with this last kernel (on Tuesday :-) )