From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo1.tiscali.be [62.235.13.210]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728CA482C for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 10:06:27 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3EEC9CEE.3070702@tiscali.be> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 16:21:02 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Paul Bame , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: 2.4.21 References: <20030613154951.GA30843@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030614234039.GB5805@riverrock.org> <20030615004130.GL30843@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <3EEC9703.5060108@tiscali.be> <20030615154432.GO30843@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030615154432.GO30843@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Matthew Wilcox wrote: >On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 03:55:47PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: > > >>Even though merge seems to me easy, if my merge patch (a diff between >>2.4.21 vanilla and my stuff) would help you, let me know. I will so try >>to prepare it on monday. >> >> > >The merge is not the problem; importing the new upstream version into >our CVS is the problem. > I well understand this pb ;-) may be opportunity to test svn? > >Having said that, when we're done, if you want to compare with your tree, >that would be useful. > > > Ok I will Joel