From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo1.tiscali.be [62.235.13.210]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0014831 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:43:09 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3EF4E2EF.5030306@tiscali.be> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:57:51 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Soete Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Paul Bame , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org References: <20030613154951.GA30843@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030614234039.GB5805@riverrock.org> <20030615004130.GL30843@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <3EEC9703.5060108@tiscali.be> <20030615154432.GO30843@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <3EEC9CEE.3070702@tiscali.be> In-Reply-To: <3EEC9CEE.3070702@tiscali.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: [parisc-linux] 2.4.22-pre1 is already out [was: Re: 2.4.21] Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi all, Sorry to answer to myself. Joel Soete wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 03:55:47PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: >> >> >>> Even though merge seems to me easy, if my merge patch (a diff >>> between 2.4.21 vanilla and my stuff) would help you, let me know. I >>> will so try to prepare it on monday. >>> >> >> >> The merge is not the problem; importing the new upstream version into >> our CVS is the problem. >> > I well understand this pb ;-) > may be opportunity to test svn? May be not so stupid ;-) finaly: see ? >> >> Having said that, when we're done, if you want to compare with your >> tree, >> that would be useful. > And finaly why not bypass 2.4.21 and jump directly to 2.4.22? would it not be easiest for the merge with upstream? Cheers, Joel