From: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault?
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:28:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F92AD98.3030104@tiscali.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F91ACEC.1010504@tiscali.be>
Too bad,
The pb re-occurs also with 2.4.21-32 but this time during two kernels
(2.4.22 && 2.6) was build at the same time. When 2.6 was finished, I can
re-launch evolution without pb. Could it be a pb of swap? How may check
if its limits were reach at this moment?
Thanks,
Joel
Joel Soete wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> I just reboot my C110 but with a kernel 2.4.21-32 and evolution works
> fine. OTC with k2.6 still failled. I will try to see later what is wrong :(
>
> Thanks again,
> Joel
>
>
> Joel Soete wrote:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> I just haven't such hw at my office where otc i can do some other
>> check on
>> the b2k model.
>>
>> On this b2k (also installed with unstable debian) run fine the same
>> release
>> of evolution (otc what i said).
>> But it is booted with last 2.4 (a merge of 23-pre7 and 22-pa12) with 256M
>> of ram (only 128k for c110) and without mozilla-psm (a recommended or
>> suggested
>> additional pkg added on c110).
>>
>> So a lot of test to figure out the present pb :)
>>
>> Thanks a lot ( I will advise you :) )
>> Joel
>>
>>
>>> -- Original Message --
>>> From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
>>> To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
>>> Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
>>> Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 16:02:02 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:42:55PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote:
>>> Hello Carlos,
>>>
>>> I launch 'gbd evolution'
>>> (gdb) run
>>> to determine the new address in this env but failed before with message:
>>> Program received signal SIG37, Real-time event 37.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> 0x4193c574 in malloc_set_state () from /lib/libc.so.6
>>>
>>>
>>> what's your opinion?
>>
>>
>>
>> That's libpthreads realtime singal mechanism working.
>> You need to set "handle all nostop" and "handle all pass" in gdb.
>>
>> Then you can do the math with /proc/<pid>
>>
>>> maps and the dying address to
>>
>>
>> calculate the _real_ library offset and function symbolic name.
>>
>> c.
>> _______________________________________________
>> parisc-linux mailing list
>> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
>> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman
>>
>>> listinfo/parisc-linux
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. Tiscali ADSL, 19,50 Euro
>> pendant 3 mois! http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> parisc-linux mailing list
>> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
>> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parisc-linux mailing list
> parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-19 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-10 22:17 [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) do_page_fault? Joel Soete
2003-10-12 18:16 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-12 18:42 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-12 20:02 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-13 11:44 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-18 21:13 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-19 15:28 ` Joel Soete [this message]
2003-10-19 19:49 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Joel Soete
2003-10-19 23:10 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-10-21 6:24 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-01 23:27 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-02 20:22 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-11-03 9:11 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-08 12:46 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-08 15:52 ` Carlos O'Donell
2003-11-08 21:11 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-08 22:09 ` [parisc-linux] fork failed? protection id trap. All suspect Carlos O'Donell
2003-11-08 22:36 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-08 22:33 ` [parisc-linux] evolution (1.4.5-1) 'protection id trap' [was: do_page_fault?] Grant Grundler
2003-11-09 0:11 ` Joel Soete
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F92AD98.3030104@tiscali.be \
--to=soete.joel@tiscali.be \
--cc=carlos@baldric.uwo.ca \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox