From: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
To: "M. Grabert" <xam@cs.ucc.ie>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>,
parisc-linux <parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] C110 builtin nic slow?
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:45:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB0CBF4.6010306@tiscali.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311110124220.2933@sal.ucc.ie>
Hi Max,
M. Grabert wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Grant Grundler wrote:
>
>
>>On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:31:45PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
>>
>>>ie a Lasi_82596 (as Matthew mentioned in a previous mail).
>>
>>yeah - that's not going to perform as well as tulip.
>>And 10-Half is going to be substantially slower.
>>Sounds like it has a bug in the negotiation.
>
>
> Very likely!
>
> My C200 is also very picky whether to enable 100MBit or not.
> I'm using a no-name 100MBit-Switch, and it works fine for all
> 5 other PCs in my house).
>
> I was not able to force 100MBit by changing the settings in the
> PDC, but the following DID work:
>
>
>>mii-tool -A 100baseTx,10baseT eth0
>
Ah interesting:
on my pc,
# mii-tool
SIOCGMIIPHY on 'eth0' failed: Operation not supported
eth1: 10 Mbit, half duplex, no link
and eth1 is the nic I use to connect my c110 :) (don't see what no link
means but that is the right setup that I need with c110)
otc on the c110:
# mii-tool
SIOCGMIIPHY on 'eth0' failed: Operation not supported
no MII interfaces found
:(
Thx a lot,
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-11 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-10 11:10 [parisc-linux] C110 builtin nic slow? Joel Soete
2003-11-10 12:31 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-10 14:00 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-10 17:35 ` Grant Grundler
2003-11-11 12:54 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-12 3:22 ` Grant Grundler
2003-11-15 19:41 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-15 22:56 ` M. Grabert
2003-11-15 23:22 ` [parisc-linux] Dual NICs on 9000/715, anyone? buggz
2003-11-15 23:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-11-15 23:50 ` buggz
2003-11-16 1:51 ` Grant Grundler
2003-11-16 4:16 ` Shane G. Brodie
2003-11-16 4:32 ` Grant Grundler
2003-11-15 23:58 ` [parisc-linux] C110 builtin nic slow? M. Grabert
2003-11-16 17:00 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-21 21:44 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-21 22:37 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-16 16:53 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-10 17:37 ` Grant Grundler
2003-11-10 19:23 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-10 20:38 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-11 1:31 ` M. Grabert
2003-11-11 11:45 ` Joel Soete [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-26 16:49 Joel Soete
2003-10-26 17:25 ` Grant Grundler
2003-10-26 20:40 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-26 21:10 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-27 19:39 ` Grant Grundler
2003-10-27 20:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-28 8:39 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-28 19:32 ` Joel Soete
2003-10-28 19:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-29 6:43 ` Joel Soete
2003-11-10 4:36 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FB0CBF4.6010306@tiscali.be \
--to=soete.joel@tiscali.be \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=xam@cs.ucc.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox