From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpout1.tiscali.be (cpout1.tiscali.be [62.235.13.193]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371AA4840 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:29:23 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:28:45 +0100 Message-ID: <400CB8A100006ED8@ocpmta3.freegates.net> In-Reply-To: <20040128231106.GC19840@baldric.uwo.ca> From: "Joel Soete" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] RE: [parisc-linux-cvs] linux-2.6 carlos To: "Carlos O'Donell" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> Any way this last test set aside any pb with _my_ gcc compiler :). > >Undo the patch, rebuild, and see if it still fails? I don't think it has any relation with any patch: since my first test of 2.6 I always reach to boot a 32bit kernel but never a 64bit kernel on this b2k (that is why I hesitate a long time before trying this on the N because suspecting a compiler pb) >Could you explain more about the failure? Well the pb is easy to easy: the last messages the palo banner advising: "... If this is the last message you see ..." then the kernel do very early a hpmc. I so try to get piminfo but everything seems to point out of kernel :(. I so try to add some printk() just at begining of init() (in init/main.c just before lock_kernel()) but it seems to not even reach this point (but not quiet sure that it is a relevant place for printk() ). So I suspect a pb in very early boot into head64.S or vmlinux.lds.S but here I could insert printk() ? Any idea? Thanks for attention, Joel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tiscali ADSL: 12 mois à 29,50 €/mois! L'Internet rapide, c'est pour tout le monde. http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr