Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
To: Riccardo <rollei@tiscalinet.it>
Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Hanging with kernels >= 2.4.22
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:54:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4038ECEF.7020606@tiscali.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4038E400.427F0528@tiscalinet.it>

Hi Ricardo,

Riccardo wrote:
> pre-scriptum: I am sending this to the list because when trying to send
> an email directly to Joel I get his MTA answering I have invalid headers
> (tried two times)

Sorry my ISP pb certainly, I will try to check with support. Thanks for advise ;)

> Joel Soete wrote:
> 
> 
>>>I would set the tag queue as default to 8 and not to 16, to stay on the
>>>safe side. Couldn't it be made configurable from the kernel
>>>configuration menu?
>>>
>>
>>Good idea.
> 
> It is not me that can make changes there, but it seems to me that 8 is
> reasonable.
Agreed (anyway you can always suggest a patch, there are always well come :) )
> Also, a kernel config option would make this parameter
> obvious to everybody. I had only a small preformance decrease from 16 to
> 8 tags (well, disk IO sucks anyway under linux-pa and my old box). While
> 2 is pure sufference :)
> 
> 
>>And you are sure that scsi id are well different and scsi chain well terminated, I supose.
> 
> Yes, the internal chain is terminated with the original HP terminator
> and I removed the disk internal ones.
> In fact substituing the original HP disk with another one removed the
> problem (strangely enough, with the older IBM drive as a second drive I
> had sometimes freezes but this problem did not appear).
> 
> 
> 
>>hmm, I leaved the same experience but with two external disks of exactly the same type (same supplier: hp, same manufactor:
>>seagate, same product reference) but with a small firmware revision difference. Unfortunately, this pb only occured under linux
>>:(. Now the disk is broken again; so no chance to test it with more recent kernel 2.4 or 2.6 :(
> 
> 
> I used a failry recent kernel for there test, I believe 2.4.23.
> 
> The scsi code doesn't seem to be so stable and performing as compared to
> hp-ux....
> 
Certainly for numerous reason but on the other hand it is not ported (i don't mean portable, i am quiet sure it is) other platform :).

Thanks for info,
	Joel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-22 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-18 23:52 [parisc-linux] Hanging with kernels >= 2.4.22 Stuart Brady
2004-02-19  6:29 ` Grant Grundler
2004-02-21  7:58   ` Stuart Brady
2004-02-21 17:05     ` Carlos O'Donell
2004-02-21 18:24       ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-02-22  6:04         ` Carlos O'Donell
2004-02-22 14:46       ` Riccardo
2004-02-22 15:30         ` Joel Soete
2004-02-22 17:16           ` Riccardo
2004-02-22 17:54             ` Joel Soete [this message]
2004-02-22  6:21     ` Grant Grundler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4038ECEF.7020606@tiscali.be \
    --to=soete.joel@tiscali.be \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=rollei@tiscalinet.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox