From: "Joel Soete" <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
To: "Randolph Chung" <randolph@tausq.org>,
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: RE: [parisc-linux] Spinlock patch, take 2
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:30:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40561EAF000035FA@ocpmta1.freegates.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040315063318.GC2384@tausq.org>
>
> Here's another version of my spinlock patch against 2.6.4. It optimizes
>spinlocks used for atomic operations by putting the atomic locks into a
>special section that is guaranteed to be 16-byte aligned, so no runtime
>alignment is needed. Build-tested against 2.6.4. Comments?
>
Ongoing to try to apply it against 2.6.[45] and encounter very early a pb
which seems to be solved by following patch:
--- include/asm-parisc/smp.h.orig 2004-01-28 08:24:41.000000000 +0100
+++ include/asm-parisc/smp.h 2004-03-19 11:34:04.078456992 +0100
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
#define smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
#define cpu_online(cpu) cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_online_map)
-#define cpu_possible_map cpu_present_map
+#define cpu_possible_map cpu_present_mask
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
=========><=========
Is it correct?
But using c3k config and adding smp support to 2.6.5-rc1, I encounter this
ld pb:
gcc -Wp,-MD,drivers/usb/core/.devices.o.d -nostdinc -iwithprefix include
-D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mno-space-regs -mfast-indirect-calls
-mdisable-fpregs -ffunction-sections -march=2.0 -mschedule=8000 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-DKBUILD_BASENAME=devices -DKBUILD_MODNAME=usbcore -c -o drivers/usb/core/devices.o
drivers/usb/core/devices.c
ld -r -o drivers/usb/core/usbcore.o drivers/usb/core/usb.o drivers/usb/core/hub.o
drivers/usb/core/hcd.o drivers/usb/core/urb.o drivers/usb/core/message.o
drivers/usb/core/config.o drivers/usb/core/file.o drivers/usb/core/buffer.o
drivers/usb/core/driverfs.o drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.o drivers/usb/core/devio.o
drivers/usb/core/inode.o drivers/usb/core/devices.o
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 164: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion `info[9]->d_un.d_val == sizeof (Elf32_Rela)' failed!
make[3]: *** [drivers/usb/core/usbcore.o] Error 127
make[2]: *** [drivers/usb/core] Error 2
Any idea? (the same kernel 2.6.5-rc1 + same patches but with a500 config
+smp compiles well :) )
Thanks in advance,
Joel
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tiscali ADSL: 35 /mois, la meilleure offre du marché!
http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-19 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-15 6:33 [parisc-linux] Spinlock patch, take 2 Randolph Chung
2004-03-15 7:37 ` Carlos O'Donell
2004-03-15 7:43 ` Randolph Chung
2004-03-19 14:30 ` Joel Soete [this message]
2004-03-19 16:27 ` Joel Soete
2004-03-25 7:28 ` Randolph Chung
2004-03-25 6:00 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40561EAF000035FA@ocpmta1.freegates.net \
--to=soete.joel@tiscali.be \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox