From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Soete Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Heads up, 2.6.7-pa0 FTBS with 64-bit toolchain + loop Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:59:10 +0000 Message-ID: <40D4C53E.5000309@tiscali.be> References: <20040616194411.GB3412@baldric.uwo.ca> <40D35B15.3040505@tiscali.be> <20040618212505.GA12572@engsoc.org> <20040619011714.GC23535@colo.lackof.org> <20040619015455.GE12572@engsoc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: Kyle McMartin Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20040619015455.GE12572@engsoc.org> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org Hello all, And there is also this pb mentionned by James: regarding the pb of pointer comparison with gcc-3.3 and 3.4 64bits (sorry I didn't find back the gcc bug report reference) which iirc jda re-qualified it in a binutils pb. (That why of my interest in binutils 2.15 :) to see if I can help.) That said, my very interest in 3.4 (and 3.5 now because is became the debian gcc-snapshot ;) ) is to continue the glibc-2.3.3 test and see if additional integer lib (hp one iirc) can help for the few test which still failled? I was focused last month on my c110 ncr53c8xx bug; now I trust it is fixed, so jda if you think that I can be of better help else where I can always try to have a look ;). Please advise. Joel Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 07:17:14PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > >>Should I be testing 64-bit kernels built with this toolchain >>or stick with my trusty gcc 3.0.4-hppa64 handmade debs? >> > > There's a bug in hppa64 gcc sometime after 3.0.4 (it shows up in the > gcc-3.3-hppa64 and gcc-3.4-hppa64 debs) that causes builds to fail in > (at least) loop.c. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14782 is the bug Randolph > filed. > > I've been building hppa64 kernels with the gcc 3.0.4 debs on the FTP > server, until this issue is resolved. :/ > > Regards, _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux