From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>
Subject: Re: HPPA and Squeeze
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:33:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4A39DFAA.30803@debian.org>
References: <20090618013510.0484B4FE2@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Return-path: <linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090618013510.0484B4FE2@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
List-ID: <linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org

John David Anglin wrote:
>> Grant Grundler schrieb:
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:49:26AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>>>> Grant Grundler wrote:

> I can understand the desire to trim architectures.  However, it's clear
> the current decision was based on some misinformation, and an unclear
> rational.

There is no desire to trim working architectures.

It's very easy to tell there is nothing wrong when you don't have to
deal with unreliable build daemons, endless discussions but no visible
progress (except for java support) and complaints from DSA, package
maintainers and others.

Cheers

Luk