Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, carlos@systemhalted.org,
	randolph@tausq.org
Subject: Re: Out of order unwind entry warning
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:39:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AEBE9BF.6070403@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091031021925.GA425@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>

On 10/31/2009 03:19 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, John David Anglin wrote:
>
>> There seems to a problem with readelf -u on 32-bit kernels.  The
>> address ranges are wrong.  The segment offset doesn't seem to be
>> being handled correctly.
>
> readelf -u uses the base address of the segment containing the
> .PARISC.unwind section.  On 64-bit kernels, the .PARISC.unwind
> section is in the same segment as the .text section, so the
> addresses print are correct.  However, on recent 32-bit kernels,
> this is not the case:
>
>   Section to Segment mapping:
>    Segment Sections...
>     00     .text .rodata .init.rodata __bug_table .pci_fixup .builtin_fw __ksymtab __ksymtab_gpl __kcrctab __kcrctab_gpl __ksymtab_strings __param
>     01     __ex_table .PARISC.unwind .data.read_mostly .data .got .data.vmpages .bss
>     02     .data.init_task .init.text .init.data .init.setup .initcall.init .con_initcall.init .exit.text
>     03
>
> .PARISC.unwind is readonly, so it shouldn't be in a W segment.


apply the patch in http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/55797/ before testing.
.PARISC.unwind is then still in a RW segment, but at least you will get more reliable output.

Helge

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-31  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-26 22:21 Out of order unwind entry warning Helge Deller
2009-10-26 23:41 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-10-27  1:50   ` Randolph Chung
2009-10-27  2:24     ` Kyle McMartin
2009-10-27 23:19 ` John David Anglin
2009-10-28 21:42   ` Helge Deller
2009-10-28 22:00     ` Helge Deller
2009-10-28 23:10       ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 20:51         ` Helge Deller
2009-10-29 13:20       ` Carlos O'Donell
2009-10-28 22:18     ` John David Anglin
2009-10-28 22:43       ` Helge Deller
2009-10-28 22:59         ` Helge Deller
2009-10-29  2:11           ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 16:38             ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 19:16           ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 20:46             ` Helge Deller
2009-10-29 21:07               ` John David Anglin
2009-10-29 22:22                 ` Helge Deller
2009-10-29 23:35                   ` John David Anglin
2009-10-30 22:47                     ` Helge Deller
2009-10-31  0:41                       ` John David Anglin
2009-10-31  2:19                         ` John David Anglin
2009-10-31  7:39                           ` Helge Deller [this message]
2009-11-01 23:16                       ` John David Anglin
2009-11-02  1:40                         ` John David Anglin
2009-11-02  2:34                           ` John David Anglin
2009-11-02 21:02                             ` Helge Deller
2009-11-02 21:50                               ` John David Anglin
2009-11-02 22:20                                 ` Helge Deller
2009-11-02 22:31                                   ` James Bottomley
2009-11-02 22:43                                     ` Helge Deller
2009-11-02 22:52                                   ` Helge Deller
2009-11-02 23:23                                     ` John David Anglin
2009-11-03 21:10                                       ` Helge Deller
2009-11-03 21:36                                         ` John David Anglin
2009-11-03 21:43                                           ` Helge Deller
2009-11-03 21:54                                             ` John David Anglin
2009-11-03 22:04                                               ` Helge Deller
2009-11-04  0:57                                                 ` John David Anglin
2009-11-06 23:07                                                   ` Helge Deller
2009-11-07 20:11                                                     ` Kyle McMartin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AEBE9BF.6070403@gmx.de \
    --to=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randolph@tausq.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox