From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Helge Deller Subject: Re: Changes to fcntl.h and F_* numbers? Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:55:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4B12D1BD.90602@gmx.de> References: <119aab440911181222v79ad775ena36a4140e80847e3@mail.gmail.com> <20091119032220.GG28962@bombadil.infradead.org> <119aab440911190900t62122ed8m987c55821ca64062@mail.gmail.com> <1258651414.6363.12.camel@mulgrave.site> <119aab440911201457j1727576blde3c62569f927711@mail.gmail.com> <4B10509D.3020400@gmx.de> <119aab440911291017h1704a159j61421323b8099a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: James Bottomley , Kyle McMartin , linux-parisc To: Carlos O'Donell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <119aab440911291017h1704a159j61421323b8099a3@mail.gmail.com> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org On 11/29/2009 07:17 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Helge Deller wrote: >> Hi Carlos, >> >> FWIW, Stephen's patch has been applied to mainline (2.6.32-rc8) in the >> meantime... > > Thanks Helge. Could you do some sleuthing for me? Were the F_SETOWN_EX > and F_GETOWN_EX ever in any released kernel? Those were added by this commit: commit ba0a6c9f6fceed11c6a99e8326f0477fe383e6b5 Author: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed Sep 23 15:57:03 2009 -0700 fcntl: add F_[SG]ETOWN_EX Linux kernel 2.6.31 was tagged: Date: Wed Sep 9 15:13:59 2009 -0700 (according to the git-log of the top Makefile) So I don't think they were ever in any released kernel. Helge