From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John David Anglin Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: futex: Use same lock set as lws calls Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:56:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4EB04EDE.7000501@bell.net> References: <20111009204010.GA22374@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <2746859.nK5NlKbf2R@donald.sf-tec.de> <4EAF562A.2070407@systemhalted.org> <20111101091954.GB27751@glitch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed To: Carlos O'Donell , Rolf Eike Beer , linux-parisc Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111101091954.GB27751@glitch> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org On 11/1/2011 5:19 AM, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:15:06PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> > On 10/30/2011 9:36 PM, John David Anglin wrote: >>> > > I've been wondering how much is left to install to glibc head? >> > >> > I've pushed out almost all of glibc-ports into upstream. >> > >> > There are probably a half-dozen patches against glibc proper for which I'm writing up submissions and making sure I don't impact x86 fast path. >> > >> > Submitting patches to core glibc isn't like any other project:-) > glibc or eglibc? Many of the debian packages that I have been building seem for cell phones, so I understand the confusion 8-) Dave -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net