From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Helge Deller Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] parisc updates for v3.10 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 22:31:04 +0200 Message-ID: <518C0788.8060200@gmx.de> References: <20130507221102.GA5338@p100.box> <20130508113704.5ac23906e0e513b4a76d5b55@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Linux Kernel Development , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130508113704.5ac23906e0e513b4a76d5b55@canb.auug.org.au> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On 05/08/2013 03:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:11:02 +0200 Helge Deller wrote: >> >> please pull the parisc architecture updates for v3.10 from: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git parisc-for-3.10 > > Does this mean that the parisc tree I have in linux-next > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/parisc-2.6.git#for-next) > is defunct? Not sure. It will be either James or me who will send pull requests... Of course we will agree who of us will do that and from which tree. So, would it hurt if you add a second parisc tree for linux-next? I've just created a "for-next" branch in my git repository: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git#for-next Helge