From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damian Hobson-Garcia Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-mapping: Define dma_{alloc,free}_attrs() for all archs Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:37:17 +0900 Message-ID: <519C2F5D.8000809@igel.co.jp> References: <1367290899-10410-1-git-send-email-dhobsong@igel.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, msalter@redhat.com, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, deller@gmx.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org To: Damian Hobson-Garcia Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1367290899-10410-1-git-send-email-dhobsong@igel.co.jp> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org Hello, On 2013/04/30 12:01, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote: > Most architectures that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, have implementations for > both dma_alloc_attrs() and dma_free_attrs(). All achitectures that do > not define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA also have both of these definitions provided by > dma-mapping-broken.h. > > Provide a default definition for the archs that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, > but have no implementation for dma_{alloc,free}_attrs(). > > As I don't have hardware for any of these systems, the patches are only > compile-tested where I could (arm64, s390) and untested for the archs > where I couldn't find a readily available prebuilt cross-compiler (c6x, parisc). > > arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------ > arch/c6x/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++ > arch/parisc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++ > arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------ > 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > Since this series spans several architectures, what would be the best way to have this patch series merged? Should I resubmit each patch to the mailing list for each architecture separately? Thank you, Damian -- Damian Hobson-Garcia IGEL Co.,Ltd http://www.igel.co.jp