From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
realmz paranoid <realmz6@gmail.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org"
<uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: *: remove '__init' for setup_profiling_timer()
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:11:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5271F4A9.40804@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075153861@IN01WEMBXA.internal.synopsys.com>
On 10/31/2013 01:45 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/23/2013 07:36 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Most of architectures not use '__init' for setup_profiling_timer(), so
>> need remove it, or can generate warning (e.g. arc with allmodconfig):
>>
>> MODPOST vmlinux.o
>> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3c682): Section mismatch in reference from the function write_profile() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
>> The function write_profile() references
>> the function __init setup_profiling_timer().
>> This is often because write_profile lacks a __init
>> annotation or the annotation of setup_profiling_timer is wrong.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c | 2 +-
>> arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> index bca3052..3bdac11 100644
>> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>> /*
>> * not supported here
>> */
>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> index 11789be..3bef058 100644
>> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void __init platform_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>> init_cpu_present(&mask);
>> }
>>
>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> index 8a252f2..2e8cd36 100644
>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> -int __init
>> +int
>> setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> In theory this change is OK. However this is legacy code at best and it would be
> better to define a weak definition in kernel/profile.c and remove this cruft from
> relevant arches. I'll send out a patch.
>
That sounds good to me.
> -Vineet
>
>
--
Chen Gang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-23 2:05 [PATCH] arch: *: remove '__init' for setup_profiling_timer() Chen Gang
2013-10-31 5:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-31 6:11 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-10-31 6:14 ` Chen Gang
2013-10-31 6:22 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-31 6:36 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5271F4A9.40804@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=realmz6@gmail.com \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).