From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEDAC433FE for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1BB61073 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233034AbhJNWTn (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:19:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33666 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230493AbhJNWTm (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:19:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71CA2C061753 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id l6so5106251plh.9 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:17:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=axtens.net; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=/gn1naYin2rxewmNR+UQ+4Ua2Az6pxvVd0XA2L6nJ+U=; b=ONfSismG4d04naWppWaw5fFBIKSKKMAy0gVJiXZrFConvnU5E8d2Ayd3VDh0kKxPlM KfYheVy3VZqFxW7C3SyDj3kHRI0/KpnkFFKB2eHymwNvTlk77B8NEvbREKsCxf/hUfZR 66TL6htytJE5V6/HVu+C2OZbv0Cu9cqLYCK78= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=/gn1naYin2rxewmNR+UQ+4Ua2Az6pxvVd0XA2L6nJ+U=; b=oXgsRUbOFSjTtF9Tu9UowyMLWrflRfyDCnLx5jafwolhcyxno/Dqp0iS95NX0k1tyl 1Bg1z1ne/B1DGGf5ldSRFLFMlxDFoDWwfLuatfiNFroWX2i/cQJdPRCyGSLh0aIoM5Wb DZtNNsRcbvpZs9iXIgZ3WN2iLmaC6+UyKANdpm8hZfBQkNsDNWg6V6QWwZqazE5Fys12 UwiZZHDXwa9rpJbsgSH+jRoUrdMe2ARV0/Oc8yN4+A3Ife+oHtGLSS9xFBS6ukYB/s36 0EhN+M6W5IxSnzPo3zzBgNEoApLAZldeSwthUtnlJFsnJ6Er9VLYIBwNNxLqUuDfofNw A2fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530EQInL9Zvc5oNlsBWHLCXF0dHHZiSBTBRz4LcI03NeaR1LChUl cunFuJ+AlwRFT2Oy06i1gavc0A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzab2EpHK7Q/T8QXwpqraVUPmAWt0eL0woPg5T6pMmI9UAwBAQkaSq8CsyFo20UObxGkQ6Z9w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:224e:: with SMTP id hk14mr9005831pjb.224.1634249856727; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2001:4479:e300:600:4901:2fb9:ed97:3a3e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x27sm3586622pfo.90.2021.10.14.15.17.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:17:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Axtens To: Christophe Leroy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Andrew Morton , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Arnd Bergmann , Kees Cook , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] powerpc: Remove func_descr_t In-Reply-To: <16eef6afbf7322d0c07760ebf827b8f9f50f7c6e.1634190022.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> References: <16eef6afbf7322d0c07760ebf827b8f9f50f7c6e.1634190022.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:17:33 +1100 Message-ID: <874k9j45fm.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Christophe Leroy writes: > 'func_descr_t' is redundant with 'struct ppc64_opd_entry' So, if I understand the overall direction of the series, you're consolidating powerpc around one single type for function descriptors, and then you're creating a generic typedef so that generic code can always do ((func_desc_t)x)->addr to get the address of a function out of a function descriptor regardless of arch. (And regardless of whether the arch uses function descriptors or not.) So: - why pick ppc64_opd_entry over func_descr_t? - Why not make our struct just called func_desc_t - why have a ppc64_opd_entry type or a func_descr_t typedef? - Should this patch wait until after you've made the generic func_desc_t change and move directly to that new interface? (rather than move from func_descr_t -> ppc64_opd_entry -> ...) Or is there a particular reason arch specific code should use an arch-specific struct or named type? > Remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h | 6 ------ > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 8 ++++---- > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h > index 4ba834599c4d..f3445188d319 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static inline unsigned long ppc_function_entry(void *func) > * function's descriptor. The first entry in the descriptor is the > * address of the function text. > */ > - return ((func_descr_t *)func)->entry; > + return ((struct ppc64_opd_entry *)func)->addr; > #else > return (unsigned long)func; > #endif > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h > index f1630c553efe..97da77bc48c9 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/types.h > @@ -23,12 +23,6 @@ > > typedef __vector128 vector128; > > -typedef struct { > - unsigned long entry; > - unsigned long toc; > - unsigned long env; > -} func_descr_t; I was a little concerned about going from a 3-element struct to a 2-element struct (as ppc64_opd_entry doesn't have an element for env) - but we don't seem to take the sizeof this anywhere, nor do we use env anywhere, nor do we do funky macro stuff with it in the signal handling code that might implictly use the 3rd element, so I guess this will work. Still, func_descr_t seems to describe the underlying ABI better than ppc64_opd_entry... > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > > #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_TYPES_H */ > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c > index 1831bba0582e..63ddbe7b108c 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c > @@ -933,11 +933,11 @@ int handle_rt_signal64(struct ksignal *ksig, sigset_t *set, > * descriptor is the entry address of signal and the second > * entry is the TOC value we need to use. > */ > - func_descr_t __user *funct_desc_ptr = > - (func_descr_t __user *) ksig->ka.sa.sa_handler; > + struct ppc64_opd_entry __user *funct_desc_ptr = > + (struct ppc64_opd_entry __user *)ksig->ka.sa.sa_handler; > > - err |= get_user(regs->ctr, &funct_desc_ptr->entry); > - err |= get_user(regs->gpr[2], &funct_desc_ptr->toc); > + err |= get_user(regs->ctr, &funct_desc_ptr->addr); > + err |= get_user(regs->gpr[2], &funct_desc_ptr->r2); Likewise, r2 seems like a worse name than toc. I guess we could clean that up another time though. Kind regards, Daniel > } > > /* enter the signal handler in native-endian mode */ > -- > 2.31.1