public inbox for linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Sebastian Wankerl <sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@googlemail.com>,
	i4passt@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 11:16:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP23C8D54498C7DFACDF083B97DB0@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365245524.4298.14.camel@dabdike.spectrum.wifi>

On 6-Apr-13, at 6:52 AM, James Bottomley wrote:

> On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 15:22 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> The problem is our assumption that section names be unique.  This
>>> assumption is wrong.  The ELF spec says (version 1.1 page 1-15): "An
>>> object file may have more than one section with the same name."   
>>> We need
>>> to fix the kernel not to rely on a bogus assumption ... but we had  
>>> no
>>> idea how to do that in a way that preserved the backwards  
>>> compatibility
>>> of sections subdirectory.
>>>
>>> I admit that 35dead4235e2b67da7275b4122fed37099c2f462 is a hack,  
>>> but now
>>> the problem has got attention, can we fix it properly?
>>
>> Yep.  The original patch didn't go through me, or we would have had  
>> this
>> discussion back then...
>>
>> The use of section names in sysfs goes back to one Mr. Corbet.  Why  
>> did
>> he do it that way?  Because gdb's add-symbol-file makes the same
>> assumption.  So if we fixed the sysfs somehow, it still wouldn't be
>> useful, since there's no way to tell gdb :(
>>
>> The real answer don't use -ffunction-sections on modules: probably  
>> not
>> as important as the rest of the kernel.  And the new shiny is
>> -flto anyway.
>>
>> And that leaves us with a PA-RISC specific issue, for which we should
>> move the fix to PA-RISC.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Well, we don't have much of a choice.  Our ELF stub jump on 32 bits  
> is a
> PCREL17.  That means once a module size is over 128k there's a  
> chance we
> might not be able to link it because the jump is too big for the
> instruction.  IPV6 is one such big module today, but I'm sure there  
> are
> others.  The only way I know to fix this is to allow the linker to
> insert stubs between functions, so we only fail at linking if a single
> function is >128k big.  The way to do this is -ffunction-sections,
> unless there's something else we could do (all we really need is a way
> to ensure we can insert ELF stubs every 128k).

There is now a config work around for this.  See:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-parisc/msg04521.html

Dave
--
John David Anglin	dave.anglin@bell.net




  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-06 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1364994499-23708-1-git-send-email-sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de>
     [not found] ` <87mwtf3ya1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
     [not found]   ` <515D4A7F.5070102@cip.cs.fau.de>
2013-04-05  4:00     ` [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs Rusty Russell
2013-04-05  9:40       ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-05 10:07       ` James Bottomley
2013-04-06  4:52         ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-06 10:52           ` James Bottomley
2013-04-06 15:16             ` John David Anglin [this message]
2013-04-07  1:22               ` James Bottomley
2013-04-07  1:45                 ` John David Anglin
2013-04-06 10:40         ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-08  4:14           ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-08 11:55             ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-11 14:11             ` Philip Kranz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BLU0-SMTP23C8D54498C7DFACDF083B97DB0@phx.gbl \
    --to=dave.anglin@bell.net \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=i4passt@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philip.kranz@googlemail.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox